Well, T.S.

To the best of my knowledge, no-one has ever attempted to assign an author to the initials appended to The Perplex’d Prince – “T.S.” – but I do rather wonder…

I pointed out the reference to Absalom And Achitopel in the preface to The Perplex’d Prince. I didn’t realise it at the time, but there’s a second Dryden poem mentioned there: The Medal. This was a reaction to the reaction to the dismissal of the charges against the Earl of Shaftesbury (if you follow me), after he was accused of high treason in the wake of the Exclusion Crisis. His supporters marked the occasion by pressing a medal that showed a symbolic Shaftesbury, in the form of a sun, emerging from behind black clouds.

Dryden’s response was The Medal, or A Satyr Against Sedition, a poem it is said was [*cough, cough*] suggested by Charles himself. This bitter attack upon Shaftesbury and his followers brought Dryden still more into the public eye, and not everyone was happy about it.

One of those who responded in print was Thomas Shadwell, a poet and playwright – and fervent Protestant. Shadwell and Dryden had once been friends and collaborators, but Dryden’s acceptance of a position at Charles’s court put an end to that. After the publication of The Medal, Shadwell retaliated with The Medal Of John Bayes: A Satyr Against Folly And Knavery, a brutal attack on Dryden himself. Nothing loath, Dryden hit right back with Mac Flecknoe: A Satyr On The Trew-Blue-Protestant Poet, T.S., and then took another swing in the second part of Absalom And Achitopel, in which Shadwell appears – unflatteringly, I need hardly say – in the character of Og.

It was Dryden’s use of Shadwell’s initials in Mac Flecknoe, and his assumption that the reading public would know who “T.S.” was, that made me wonder whether Shadwell could possibly have been the author of The Perplex’d Prince – and whether Dryden even meant to imply that it was so. The pamphlet fits with Shadwell’s declared politics, certainly, but what interests me more is the dismissive way in which Dryden’s hugely successful poems are mentioned in the preface, being ranked alongside the mere disposable detritus of the literary world.

Then again, such a manoeuvre may have been too subtle for Shadwell, who apparently preferred the fist to the sword. Perhaps a third party, the true author, made use of Shadwell’s initials, either to hide behind them or just as a joke. Or perhaps it was another T.S. altogether: there was a Thomas Sprat writing at the time, but he seems to have been a straightforward royalist, so that makes it improbable. Anyway, I like to think it was Shadwell.

John Dryden remained Poet Laureate through the reigns of Charles and James, but when James went, so did he – to be succeeded by his arch-rival. Thomas Shadwell may have lost the literary war against John Dryden, but with his own appointment to the position of Poet Laureate under William, he certainly had the last laugh.

Advertisements

9 Responses to “Well, T.S.”

  1. I’m suddenly glad that Neal Stephenson never got interested in this topic.

  2. In what sense? (I know who is he but I haven’t read him, so please elaborate.)

  3. I was thinking that this is just the sort of historical topic that Neal Stephenson would get all interested in and then digress into for forty pages in an otherwise interesting novel.

  4. Whereas here you just get the 40-page digression. 🙂

    • I just started reading the final volume of The Baroque Cycle, after avoiding it for a year or so, and in the first few pages there’s a scene where some character starts discoursing on the origin of the word [i]coin[/i], only to be cut off by another guy who apparently speaks for Stephenson’s complaining readers.

      But the rest of the book is as bloated as ever.

  5. Also some possible textual allusions: Dryden’s rather well-written Absolom (a thinly-disguised Monmouth):

    Few words he said but easy those and meet
    More slow than hybla drops and far more sweet.

    … looks like the model for T.S.’s more prosaic Lucilious (Monmouth’s mother):

    “… she spoke but seldom, but when she did her words were always weighty and to the purpose, and withal so sweet and delectable, that with a pleasing kind of Majick they enchanted every Ear that heard them.”

    The idea isn’t mine (_Memoirs of the Court of England in 1875_, trans. Mrs. W.H. Arthur and ed. G.D. Gilbert (London 1913), pp. 366-7), but they get the order of the two works the wrong way round…

  6. Hi – welcome! A case of Dryden showing T.S. how it should be done, then? With all the intertextuality going on at this time – not to mention the outright thievery – I wouldn’t be a bit surprised.

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: